Sigrún Davíðsdóttir's Icelog

What money can’t buy: extra services in an Icelandic prison

with 7 comments

Thirteen people, mostly ex-bankers, have now been sent to prison in cases connected to the banking collapse brought by the Office of Special Prosecutor. Four of these prisoners keep giving rise to media coverage in Iceland: earlier in November it turned out that they had applied for a riding course, organised by the Agricultural University of Iceland. In the end, the director of the Prison Service refused to accept that this expensive course fulfilled the set criteria for prisoners’ rehabilitation. It also ensued that these prisoners have allegedly made use of PR firms.

For the time being, three former top managers of Kaupthing – Hreiðar Már Sigurðsson, Magnús Guðmundsson and Sigurður Einarsson – and the bank’s second largest shareholder Ólafur Ólafsson are in prison, serving sentences from four to six years. The prison that houses them, Kvíabryggja, is on the Northern side of Snæfellsnes, close to the tip of the peninsula that can be seen from Reykjavík on a clear day.

These four prisoners, sentenced in the so-called al Thani case, are not the first sentenced in relation to the banking collapse but they are the first to continuously making media headlines. In 2003 a member of Alþingi was sentenced to prison for embezzlement from public funds. Also staying at Kvíabryggja he procured new mattresses for the prison.

Shortly after the four were imprisoned there were news that also they wanted to pay for some improvements at Kvíabryggja but this is no longer legal: prisoners can’t use their funds things at Kvíabryggja at their own will.

An exclusive course for wealthy prisoners

In early November the Icelandic media covered a story regarding a riding course these four prisoners allegedly wanted to take part in. The Agricultural University offers riding courses, intended for A level students and was willing to offer it to the four prisoners at Kvíabryggja. The course was to run on weekends this winter, starting early November, in a riding hall at a farm next to but not belonging to the prison.

The cost was €3.800 per participant. The course only included the teaching, which meant the prisoners had to provide a horse, saddle and other things needed, apparently not a problem. Ólafsson who for years has owned a grand summerhouse close by the prison is known in Icelandic equestrian circles as the owner of some of the most expensive and outstanding horses in Iceland.

It seems that when the director of the Prison Service Páll Winkler heard about this he inquired if the course was offered to all prisoners. Apparently that was not the case. Though being part of the curriculum offered by the Agricultural University in this case it was allegedly tailor-made for these four prisoners, at a price only very few prisoners will be able to afford. Consequently, Winkler interfered and the course was called off.

Prisoners, a riding course and human rights

Following Winkler’s comments to the media that the riding course did not fit rules on courses acceptable for prisoners the wife of Ólafsson, Ingibjörg Kristjánsdóttir, wrote an article in one of the Icelandic papers, Fréttablaðið, accusing Winkler of inappropriate comments and breaching the prisoners’ human rights. Interestingly, the paper is owned by Ingibjörg Pálmadóttir, the wife of Jón Ásgeir Jóhannesson; Jóhannesson is charged by the OSP in a pending case.

Kristjánsdóttir claims that Winkler’s comment breached the prisoners’ human rights, made at the cost of people he should be protecting, “prisoners who have few to speak for them in a society of hate and revengefulness, prisoners that Páll knows are not allowed to speak to the media. Thus the prisoners are defenceless against the attack by the director of the Prison Service.”

Winkler answered, claiming that talking about “breach of human rights” showed Kristjánsdóttir’s “lack of understanding and utter lack of respect for people who have really suffered breach of human rights from public institutions, either in this country or abroad.” Rules had been followed and he had no further comments to this case.

Prisoners with PR people

In relation to the riding course Winkler said to Rúv that a very small group of prisoners has access to millions of króna and even makes use of public relation firms to contact him and the prison service. “PR firms have contacted me, asking me to say a, b or c or not to say a, b or c. I found this utterly preposterous and was left speechless.”

Winkler also says that wealthy prisoners have tried to buy services that are not offered to prisoners in general. “This is a delicate balance because if this is something offered to all prisoners I am of course only glad when the situation can be improved.” However, services for only a select group of prisoners is unacceptable.

As an example Winkler mentions a new association, “Friends of Kvíabryggja” set up to improve life at Kvíabryggja, offering funds for improvements but this is, according to Winkler, unacceptable. He has i.a. refused requests for a yoga course and more tv channels. “If you are powerful and want to improve the situation for prisoners you turn to Alþingi and do it through the Budget.”

Follow me on Twitter for running updates.

Written by Sigrún Davídsdóttir

November 27th, 2015 at 4:26 pm

Posted in Uncategorised

7 Responses to 'What money can’t buy: extra services in an Icelandic prison'

Subscribe to comments with RSS or TrackBack to 'What money can’t buy: extra services in an Icelandic prison'.

  1. It is a pity that Iceland does not have a law requiring the Confiscation of the Proceeds of Crime.

    cirsium

    27 Nov 15 at 10:24 pm

  2. Wonderful – you really couldn’t make it up!

    anrigaut

    28 Nov 15 at 9:07 am

  3. Hilarious…
    Like everywhere else the arrogance and the stupidity of the 1% needs to be exposed.
    Thinking of J. K. Rowling, when asked to give a definition of poverty she said: counting the pennies to put in the gaz meter. Obviously they ain’t got any idea.

    goupil

    28 Nov 15 at 4:54 pm

  4. Cirsium; well, proceeds of crime should be confiscated in Iceland. In these fraud cases the people sentenced have not directly pocketed money. There are however many examples that bankers did get loans from the banks where they worked and the winding-up boards have taken people to court to enforce repayment, in some cases bankrupting them. So it’s not that those sentenced are allowed to keep the proceeds, if any.

    Sigrún Davídsdóttir

    28 Nov 15 at 9:46 pm

  5. Well at least they are in jail. And hopefully some of their assets will be confiscated.
    Unlike the bankers in any other country.
    Such a shame that the UK press won’t publish these facts.

    Tony Shearer

    29 Nov 15 at 9:59 am

  6. Non sequitur re: capital control

    Opening the border of Iceland may bring investment money for a new aluminium smelter maybe or else but there is a good case to control the flow of foreign money.

    http://www.nytimes.com/2015/12/08/business/dealbook/economists-criticism-of-federal-reserve-policies-gains-ground.html?_r=0

    Goupil

    8 Dec 15 at 6:14 pm

  7. Sigurður Einarsson declared himself bankrupt in September 2015 after being “ordered [in July] to pay more than 700 million ISK (5 million EUR) in back taxes on stock options he had been given as chairman of Kaupþing. In 2010 the Reykjavík District Court had also ordered him to pay nearly 500 [million?] ISK (3.5 million EUR) to the estate of Kaupþing due to loans he had received to buy shares in the bank.”

    Apparently the liquidation of his estate is now completed and it reveals he had effectively no assets:
    http://icelandmag.visir.is/tags/bankruptcy

    Sounds very convenient …

    anrigaut

    8 Jan 16 at 5:01 pm

Leave a Reply