Sigrún Davíðsdóttir's Icelog

SFO and the Tchenguiz brothers

with one comment

In an FT front page article today, the story is of an SFO lawyer who in a report warned the SFO not to pursue a case against the Tchenguiz brothers. One of the reasons: “It was an Icelandic bank, with many of the suspects in the case being Icelandic nationals, allegedly committing fraud against Icelandic institutions, taxpayers and authorities,” according to a person who has seen the report.

Correct, Kaupthing was an Icelandic bank – but it had a subsidiary here in the UK, these loans were made here and in Luxembourg, not in Iceland. This happened on the SFO’s turf, with clients based here and most of the money spent here. Surely, a clear case for the SFO to investigate. Otherwise, there wouldn’t be anyone to investigate these matters. Otherwise, the UK is a free-for-all foreign financiers to get involved with UK citizens with good offers.

Most of the cases pursued by the SFO are against some previously unknown crooks who have managed to swindle lots of money. It’s not every day that the SFO lawyers meet someone like Lord Goldsmith in court and high-flyers like the Tchenguiz brothers. This might test SFO’s confidence but it hardly tests the legitimacy of pursuing a case involving a UK subsidiary of a foreign company.

At the heart of the case are loans that not everyone could get and the relationship Kaupthing had with its favoured clients and – in the case of Robert Tchenguiz who sat on the board of Exista – the largest shareholder of the bank.

Follow me on Twitter for running updates.

Written by Sigrún Davídsdóttir

May 22nd, 2012 at 8:30 am

Posted in Iceland

One Response to 'SFO and the Tchenguiz brothers'

Subscribe to comments with RSS or TrackBack to 'SFO and the Tchenguiz brothers'.

  1. Well said Sigrun! Let us hope the SFO’s lawyers are up to the challenge ahead. Whatever the legal niceties surrounding the search warrant in question (which it seems the SFO may indeed have bungled), the SFO were surely acting in good faith in the course of a legitimate investigation. The idea that money and influence can possibly buy evasion from British justice is simply nauseating. I fear the worst, but – as you say – it will be an interesting week.

    The FT article concludes by saying “The SFO is continuing its investigation against both men.”. I can only hope that, whatever the outcome of this week’s judicial review, the SFO will not weaken in its determination.


    22 May 12 at 9:05 am

Leave a Reply